Trends in Conflict Resolution in southern Africa

Trends in Conflict Resolution in southern Africa – Kallie de Beer and Khosana Tladi, (South Africa) ABSTRACT United States of America’s newly elected Pres Barack Obama, stemming from Afro American roots, virtually rocketed politics of conflict into an example of political literacy for contemporary deprived neighborhoods and villages. In the spirit of democratic governance and subsequent conflict resolution for social justice, the Commonwealth of Learning (COL) at its biennial forum (University of London: 2008) also preempted new research as how to influence community leaders through work integrated learning or cooperative education modules supported by Open Distance and E-learning (ODEL) modes and Open Education Resources (OER). In opening up means to reconcile conflicts and transforming adversarial norms into cooperative examples where all human livelihoods are respected -- instead of solving conflicts through the sights of assault weaponry -- ODEL and OER could provide an ideal alternative within an holistic civil education (political literacy) project of COL‘s infrastructure and its international partners, e.g. UNESCO, on the African continent. While other chapters deal with the implementation of interactive media to enhance an understanding of diversity in areas of conflict, this chapter focuses on a South African analysis of the University of the Free State’s Programme in Governance and Political Transformation (governance.HUM@ufs.ac.za:2009). This research explores for example conflicts in southern Africa with emphasis on the Republic of Lesotho along the conflict transformation “pyramid model” of Paul Lederach. This model seeks to comprehensively transform conflict, governance and political changes. It could also be generically adapted with ODEL delivery modes and OER support systems for Adult Basic Education and work integrated systems in southern African states (SADC) to influence top, middle and bottom levels of society. Figure 1. Political Map of southern Africa (Google, 2009). INTRODUCTION: Africa has always been on the agendas of international organizations for various reasons, especially, after the USA-election of President Barack Obama as the first “black” person who could achieve such a high political position in world politics. Hopes flared up that Obama will come to the rescue of many problems of Africa. However, former USA governments had huge African aid schemes, but conflicts still plagued parts of post-colonial Africa and southern Africa for decades, causing the collapse of socio-economic structures with unnecessary political tension. Aids and money often land up in the hands of corrupt government officials or war lords. Unfortunately there are no quick fixes for African states in conflict. Education and health services have especially suffered. Socio-economic development has also been severely retarded as by conflicts (Murithi, 2006:243). Typical examples are the post-2006 situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Kenya, the situation in Zimbabwe post-2008 general elections (Hagg, 2008:2-3) and the Republic of Lesotho. Lesotho could serve as an example how Open and Distance E-learning may be implemented in a land locked African state like many other such as Swaziland, Botswana , Malawi and many other Northern and Western African states. When international concerns constructed the Katse dam and Malibamatso hydro electrical scheme in Lesotho, American distance educators pioneered the remote areas to teach English in Adult Basic Education (ABE) at Thaba-Tseka and Leribe. Those learners eventually worked on the dam wall as well as to build a tar road from South Africa to this remote mountain site. Eventually these ABE-centres became linked to the distance education programmes of the National University of Lesotho (NUL) at Roma and its Institute for Extra Mural Studies (IEMS) in the capitol, Maseru (De Beer, 1995). Basutoland (Lesotho) use to be a protectorate of the British Empire and who, after their independence, supported the anti apartheid struggle against the former SA Government and were regularly raided by SA- anti insurgency units, however, also continuously suffered from internal conflicts until quite recently. Fortunately Lesotho is experiencing a post conflict era at this point in time. Reviewers of COL’s Forum for 2008, recommended to researchers in Governance, Conflict and Social Justice to keep post-conflict regions in mind, i.e. sustainability as well as workable examples (De Beer, 2008). In our case, Lesotho could also be used in this respect. The term “post-conflict reconstruction” refers to the medium- to long-term process of rebuilding war-affected communities. This includes the process of rebuilding the political, security, social and economic dimensions of a society emerging from conflict. It also involves addressing the root causes of the conflict and promoting social and economical justice, as well as putting in place political structures of governance and the rule of law in order to consolidate peace-building, development and reconciliation (Murithi, 2006:250). The above notion of post-conflict reconstruction as a medium- to long-term process of peace-building within affected communities is supported by thinkers such as Lederach (1995:3). His views of long-term peace-building processes are based on two variables, namely: the balance of power and the awareness of conflicting interests and needs. Finally, the study of conflict transformation seeks to contribute to the understanding of the historical root causes and trajectories of the political conflict in Lesotho as an example and the effect of a joint military intervention of South Africa, Botswana and Namibia had on SADC (Southern African Economic Development Countries). Lederachs pyramid model to analyse and manage conflict is applied to illustrate how the top, middle and bottom (grassroots) levels of decision makers could be identified. The question how do the application of Lederach’s diagrams assist our understanding later on, is that when there is conflict, there will be different levels of leadership that will play different roles and attempts to transform conflict together with their different approaches. The diagrams further assist us with the understanding that at different levels of the conflict in the community there should be different role players brought together around the table to begin to dialogue around the issue affecting the community for sustainable peace-building in an affected community (Tladi, 2009). According to Munro (2008), it is essential to influence those identified decision makers, for example the level leaderships in Lederach’s pyramid, with peacekeeping thinking. Once they have bought in, civil education (read political literacy ) programmes could be established with ODEL and OER to sustain long term solutions complying with Lederach’s ideas to identify decision makers. Subsequently conflict transformation refers to the process of moving from conflict-habituated systems to peace systems According to Notter and Diamond (1996:5). This process is distinguished from the more common term “conflict resolution” because of its focus on system change. Social conflicts that are deep rooted or intractable are labeled as such because conflict has created patterns that have become part of the social system, and, with the social system as the unit of analysis, the term “resolution” becomes less appropriate. Transforming deep-rooted conflict is only partly about “resolving” the issues of the conflict. The central issue is systemic change or transformation. Systems cannot be “resolved”, but they can be transformed – thus the use of the term “conflict transformation”. Therefore, conflict transformation must become a civil education process with ODEL and OER support systems to generate and create platforms that can simultaneously address change, surfacing issues and underlying social structures and relationship patterns in neighborhoods to fit in with Lederach’s “pyramid model” (Cf. Lederach, 1995:50). The following diagram (figure 2) illustrates the integration of leadership (read decision makers) and approaches to conflict transformation in the long-term peace-building process. . FEW Affected Population Many (Figure 2: Lederach, 1995:50). Top leadership represents political, religious and military leaders with a key role to play in a conflict and who are often top government and opposition leaders who speak for their respective constituencies. Middle-range leadership acts within the conflict situation and experiences the immediate impact thereof on the communities involved. This level of leadership includes ethnic groups, religious groups, academic institutions and humanitarian organisations, which are typically well recognised and respected by their own people and also within the broader network. They have a remarkable capacity to influence the decisions of policymakers, and their access the top and grassroots levels gives them a special advantage over the other levels. While they can communicate with top-level leaders, they are not bound by the political calculations governing decisions at that level. ( Cf. Lederach, 1997a:41). Grassroots leadership represents ordinary citizens at the base of a society. The local level can be seen as a microcosm of the larger conflict, with local communities often split into conflicting groups along lines of identity. There is often deep-rooted hatred and animosity in such communities, which can spill over into daily conflict. On this level, Adult Basic Education programmes could be implemented to reach far off communities with ODEL delivery systems and OER materials. For example, the Christian Health Association of Liberia (Africa) works within the broader community and public health programmes to deal with post-war trauma by reducing prejudice and enhancing community decision-making (Tladi, 2009: 57). CONCEPTUAL THREADS: Researchers such as Anstey (1991:4) defines conflict as in a relationship when “parties believe that their aspirations cannot be achieved simultaneously or perceive a divergence in their power in an effort to defeat, neutralise or eliminate each other to protect or further their interests in the interaction”. On a cultural level, transformation is linked to the idea of peace-building from below. It seeks to identify, promote and build on the resources and mechanisms within a cultural setting in order to constructively respond to and deal with conflict (Curle, 1990:10). Conflict peacekeeping modules are exactly constructed to develop such skills (Cf. UNITAR POCI, 2009). For purposes of this study, the authors also compared the literature of conflict transformation proponents such as Galtung, Ruppesinghe (2007), and Lederach (Tladi, 2009). In an overview of the developments of the conflict transformation field, Galtung (1996:51) emphasises the way in which conflict transformation can be achieved by peaceful means, focusing on four traditional but unsatisfactory ways in which conflicts between two parties are dealt with, namely: 1) A wins and B loses; 2) B wins and A loses; 3) The solution is postponed because neither A nor B feels ready to end the conflict; or 4) A confused compromise is reached, with which neither A nor B is satisfied. Therefore, Galtung’s method tries to break with these four unsatisfactory ways of dealing with conflict by finding a “fifth way”, where both A and B feel that they have won. The quoted models could be down loaded as open education materials from the internet (Cf. African Conflicts, 2009) to serve as learning materials as how the political conflicts in Lesotho sprung up from different phases of the national and local general elections and how Lederach’s conflict transformation “pyramid model” could subsequently be applied in rectifying the wrongs (truth), creating the right relationships based on equity (including gender issues) and fairness (justice), and supporting persons who have committed injustices, encouraging them to change. To accomplish these objectives, the study pursues the following objectives:  Illustrating practical methods of dealing with political conflict that could be supported with ODEL and OER in Africa;  Providing a theoretical background of other theories and concepts of conflict transformation for Co-operative Education, Work Integrated Learning (WIL) or ABET; and  Applying Lederach’s “pyramid model” of conflict transformation to Lesotho to determine the suitability of a Lifelong Learning model in resolving political conflict with civil education (OER material) supported by ODEL delivery systems. In this regard, the study is deductive because it promotes the use of ODEL and OER to illustrate how preliminary academic research is necessary to construct fit for purpose materials and delivery systems. Theoretical frameworks on their turn lead to practical examples to explain certain conflict phenomena within a certain political environment. ODEL with OER materials could therefore serve as useful tools to break down common stereotypes in comparing and counteracting phobias that are so easily dished up by politicians for their own agendas. Differentiation skills are evenly developed by OER to discern between the fables often created by the state controlled media and real scientific research facts that could enhance sustainable resolutions. To break down incorrect stereotypes within communities of conflict, there are absolutely no short cuts! “The father of fear is the grand father of ignorance (illiteracy)” (Cf. Dugan,M. in Spies, 2009). In e-mail correspondence with Spies (spies.c@gmail.com) on his above quote, he elaborated that:: “At least since Allport's generative book on prejudice in 1954, the contact hypothesis has been the backbone of a high percentage of efforts to reduce prejudice. Simply stated the hypothesis is that the increased knowledge resulting from increased contact will reduce prejudice levels. The hypothesis makes sense. Fear is a major cause of prejudice. In the case of the other, we have ‘a fear of the unknown, a fear of the unfamiliar. If fear is the father of prejudice, ignorance is its grandfather’ (Stephan and Stephan, p. 38). This is not only common sense, it is supported by research. In their preliminary meta-analysis of over 200 research studies, Pettigrew and Tropp found that ‘the initial answer to our query is that intergroup contact generally does relate negatively to prejudice’ (2000, p. 98).[1 http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/prejudice/.” Consequently, political illiterate (read ignorant) citizens often fall prey to be exploited by politicians and war lords in southern Africa. Subsequently they have to be educated with Life long Learning skills supported by ODEL and OER on a continuous basis (De Beer, 2008). It is one of the goals of the Peacekeeping Operations Correspondence Instruction (POCI) modules of the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) in Geneva, to educate on the historical background of conflicts and to develop possible skills for solving resolutions (Cf. UNITAR-POCI, 2009). From peacekeeping research it could be derived that three perspectives on sociological theories emerged after the end of World War II. Firstly, there is structural functionalism (meaning a process that takes an objective view of society from a macro perspective and emphasises social order and social and social stability, but not conflict), which provides that society is made up of different institutions or organisations that work together in cooperation, maintaining orderly relationships to observe social order and social stability (Plange, 1996:60). Secondly, there is symbolic interaction theory, which takes the position that it is people who exist and act. All the other “structures” found in society are nothing but human creations, and society is always in a process of being created, which occurs through communication and negotiation (Robertson, 1989:15). Thirdly, there is the conflict theory, which repudiates the notion that society is relatively harmonious. In fact, the conflict theory by no means views society as a system that is depicted as dichotomous groups exhibiting unequal power and unequal life changes. The conflict theory argues that the unequal distribution of wealth, power, status and opportunity is the centre feature of society (Elliot & John, 1971:10). However, by ignoring cultural differences and diversity while emphasizing material inequalities, serves as a typical example of stereotyping conflict resolution. Therefore, further research is important such as:  Definition of concepts: Conflict is viewed from two approaches, namely the subjectivist approach and the objectivist approach. The objectivist approach looks at the origin of conflict in the social and political make-up and structure of society, and considers whether the goals at stake can be thoroughly compatible (Schmid, 1968: 217-232). On the contrary, the subjectivist point of view focuses primarily on the perceived incompatibility of goals and differences, and, as Deutsch (1991:30) argues, “…it is incompatible differences which give rise to conflict…it is not the objective incompatibility that is crucial but rather the perceived incompatibility”; and  That conflicts have both life-affirming and life-destroying aspects and they form contradictions in the structure of society (Galtung, 1996:90). Once formed, conflict is prone to escalate and undergo a variety of transformational processes, namely: articulation or de-articulation, conscientisation, complexification or simplification, polarisation or de-polarisation, escalation or de-escalation, or an interactive process of attack and retaliation, which lead to a self-perpetuating cycle as understood by Lund (1996:133–134). Most importantly is to research the suffering of women and children in conflicts all over the world. Especially on the African continent (De Beer, 2008). Since, the Beijing Platform for Action 1995 in April 2005, countries were encouraged to mainstream women in government, civil society, business, and academics, corporate and informal sector which in turn will institutionalise gender equity for furthering good governance, transparency and accountability. This indeed is the case with our case study in Lesotho; hence you have some Ministers of Government being women and 30 per cent quota for women at local government (Tladi, 2009). The Concise Oxford English Dictionary (Soanes & Stevenson, 2004:110) defines the term “political” as “relating to the government or public affairs of a country”. The term “political”, derived from the Latin politicus, is flexibly interrelated and interchanged with many other concepts such as political-structural, institutional, sanctioned, government authority, legitimacy, and lawful. Winter and Bellows (1992:11) propose that political conflict involves the use of power (by the mobilising of support) in a struggle between collective actors who are trying to consolidate a political power base in order to eliminate rivals in an attempt to gain control over the allocation of authoritative values or to prevent others from gaining these advantages. An example of political conflict is the pre-1994 situation in South Africa, namely the white minority’s quest to control the black majority. Ideological conflict arises when certain groupings believe that their ideologies are superior to those of other groupings (a situation common in the current conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians). Economic conflict arises when individuals or groupings struggle to ensure control over desired resources (a typical example being the conflict between parties seeking to secure access to diamonds in the Congo Delta). Social conflict arises from inequalities among different communities based on ethnic or religious support (for instance the centuries-old conflict between Moslems and Christains, who each professes to be superior to the other in terms of religious beliefs). Cultural conflict is often based on underlying language issues – a case in point being the recent South African situation where certain foreign nationals such as Mozambicans and Zimbabweans, unable to speak certain local languages, fell victim to xenophobic attacks (Mail & Guardian, 2008:1). Psychological conflict arises from feelings of unfulfilled expectations and needs – for example, recent sporadic uprisings and marches in the Free State province of South Africa, where communities of the town of Harrismith expressed their dissatisfaction with the government’s failure to honour service-delivery promises (Van Wyk, 2006:1). In comparing other African examples, one could cite the 1997 clash in Mombasa, Kenya, where the ruling party and government enjoyed parliamentary majority support from the National Convention Assembly (NCA) and its executive arm, namely the National Convention Executive Council. The ruling party, the Kenya African National Union (KANU), and its government denied opposition parties in their small formations to register for the 1997 multiparty elections. This enraged the Islamic Party of Kenya and the National Democratic Union (NADU), which in turn galvanised their support and clashed with the government (Walter, 2002:11). METHODS OF DEALING WITH CONFLICT Conflict prevention: Burton (1990:242) defines conflict prevention as “an approach to determine conditions that create an environment of conflict, as well as the structural changes necessary to remove that conflict, and also the promotion of conditions to create more co-operative relationships instead of conflictual relationships among stakeholders”. In support of the above definition, Miall et al. (1999:48) state that conflict prevention is “a proactive capability within societies to predict and avoid destructive conflict by the spread of the problem-solving method and philosophy through all relevant institutions, discourse and practices”. ODEL and OER initiatives could exactly be regarded as pro-active methods to enhance safer neighborhoods for citizens living together in social justice. Conflict management: Peacekeeping Operations Correspondence Instruction could be regarded as courses in Human Resource Management or even Project Management because it has to do with managing people in conflict sones as well as to deal simultaneously with the parties in conflict. (Cf UNITAR-POCI, 2009). Bloomfield and Reilly (1998:18) define conflict management as a positive and constructive way of handling differences between conflicting parties. Rather than advocating methods of removing conflict, it addresses the more realistic question of managing conflict. For instance: How can conflict be dealt with in a constructive process? How can opposing sides be brought together in a cooperative process? How can a practical, achievable and cooperative system be designed for the constructive management of differences? This method was fully demonstrated in Sierra Leone between 1990 and 1999, when the country was marked by a struggle for the redistribution of scarce resources, with mismanagement and corruption the order of the day. The country was economically and politically on the verge of collapse. In trying to manage the Sierra Leone situation, the Lome Peace Agreement of July 1999 was signed and monitored by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) (Richards, 2003:15). Conflict resolution: ODEL for ABET must become part of the social process to develop or enhance livelihoods of communities. Wallensteen (2002:50) also views conflict resolution as a social situation where the conflicting parties, by means of a voluntary agreement, resolve to peacefully live with their central incompatibilities, accept one another’s continued existence as parties, and cease all violent actions against one another. In this definition, conflict resolution is seen as a social process, and the importance of the parties themselves and their voluntary actions is emphasised. Amplifying this method of dealing with conflict is the situation that occurred in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) between the years 1994 and 1999, when the president became the cause of conflict by oppressing all political opponents and treating them extremely harshly, thus resulting in the institutionalisation of power. Later, when Laurent Kabila assumed control over that government in 1997, he used different tactics that merely escalated the conflict. He changed the name of the country from Zaire to the Democratic Republic of the Congo and banned all political activities. Moreover, he rewarded his allies, namely the Congolese Tutsi, with senior administrative positions, and marginalised the Banyamulenge Tutsis. His actions consistently encouraged resistance from opposition parties and civil society at large. In July of 1999, the Lusaka Peace Agreement was signed as a method of conflict resolution, outlining the cessation of hostilities, as well as democratisation, disarmament and peacekeeping arrangements, amongst other things (Solomon & Mngqibisa, 2000:4) Conflict settlement: According to Reimann (2005:8) conflict settlement implies a definite end to direct violence, without necessarily addressing the basic causes of the conflict. Conflict transformation: Lederach (1995:15) prioritises conflict transformation as actively envisioning transformation, including respecting and promoting the human and cultural resources from within a given setting. This involves a new set of lenses through which the setting and the people in it are not primarily seen as the problem and the outsider as the answer – rather, it involves all stakeholders Lenses focusing on actors and approaches at different levels in a population affected by conflict: (Figure 3:Lederach, 1997a:80) The idea is to merge the above system to the “Good Governance” aims of COL. to assist governments and institutions to expand the scope, of learning and capacity building via ODL. using appropriate technology.including self-learning text materials, radio, DVDs, SMS, internet and audio formats.. COL prioritizes participation of deprived women and children..The strategy is to “infiltrate” the social structures and to reach the non government as well as elected government officials with Work Integrated and Life Long Learning modes re: • Decision Making processes & structures; • Leadership skills; • Roles and Responsibilities; • Gender mainstreaming;; • Capacity development facilitating participation; • Conflict resolution skills • Strengthening linkages to connect communities to larger networks and • Girls’ empowerment in community (COL, 2009) FINDINGS The Republic of Lesotho as an independent country arising from colonialism, witnessed a variety of political complications. These included political instability, failure to manage the process of demilitarisation and civil military relations effectively, intra-party conflicts and political party fragmentation. These complications created and laid a strong foundation for continued conflict between and amongst the different role players, such as government, political parties and civil society in Lesotho. This further made Lesotho vulnerable and challenged by political conflict revolving around distribution of resources, electoral systems, and behaviour of political elite, youth alienation, political participation and continuous questioning of the legitimacy of government by different political parties and civil society. Tladi’s research clearly indicates that the grassroots leadership was eventually blessed with the following values and principles of democratic processes: A sense of belonging, associated with their constitutional rights; the strengthening of the fundamental principles of good governance and open processes of dealing with political conflict, hence the positive participation of the community and its leaders in the process of political change and the elections during this period; and lastly, the initiatives and approaches of educating different members of the community about peace, conflict resolution and prejudice reduction, and democratising the community (Tladi, 2009). The success of these initiatives is evident when one considers that period, because during the political changes and electoral process that took place, the community and its local/grassroots leadership did not allow the top and middle-range leadership to entangle them in their differences over the election results. These research outcomes could ipso facto form part of ODEL modules for further action research projects under COL’s Governance, Conflict and Social Justice forum. In the conceptualization of conflict transformation Tladi found that the “pyramid model” aims at instilling moral vision and peace-building that will promote constructive change within processes. In this process of change the model will alter communications and social patterns of organisations and involved conflicting parties. ODEL IN LESOTHO Lesotho’s approaches to ODEL that may have been used in community initiatives to date are that of UNISA’S Paul West who initiated a plan for an electronic network for southern Africa that could be managed from Maseru, the capitol of Lesotho. Unfortunately, this project failed due to lack of sustainable financial support. Sustainable examples are:  The Institute of Extra Mural Studies (IEMS) in Mareru;  The Roma campus of the National University of Lesotho (NUL);  Lesotho’s first Nepad E-Learning School in southern Africa; and  the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Oracle Consortium, NEPAD and the Government of Lesotho, on 7 July 2005 at Maseru, Lesotho (Science Magazine for Africa, 2005). Problems for ICT in Lesotho comprise the following:  The challenge of first line technical support; and  Lack of general infrastructure and electricity (Oeching, 2007). Fortunately the Nepad E-Learning project has already been launched in 16 African countries, namely :Algeria, Burkina, Cameroon, Egypt, Faso,Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Mali, Mauritius, Mozambique Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Senegal,,and Uganda.. But, unfortunately bureaucracy in the clearance of equipment at airports very often causes delays in some African states writes Ochieng :(2007). According to Amaefule, (2009), the Great Chinese Wall Industry Corporation has approved a new agreement with the Nigerian Communications Satellite Limited to replace the African nation’s defunct satellite to serve the continent In contrast to the rocket science plans on grassroots level in Lesotho, many boys and girls are not able to access education and this is a real concern also as far as gender issues are concerned. Therefore, access to quality education has become a challenge for the youth in general in Lesotho, but this has not played any fundamental role in the development and escalation of political conflict in Lesotho. Like any other youth from different countries. Lesotho’s youth differs somehow in the manner they are being moulded by the dynamic culture and religious values that the country upholds. Hence, their graduation from youthfulness is linked to several socio-economic and cultural trends such as acquisition of economic independence, attaining marital status, and undergoing initiation schools. However, in addressing the issue, the Lesotho Government introduced and continues to implement free primary education, providing books to students at the secondary level, as well as supporting all the vocational training centres through the Ministry of Education, and sponsor students who have enrolled in these centres through the National Manpower Development Secretariat (Tladi,2009). In planning to overcome the afore mentioned obstacles, the Lesotho government embarked on the following Information Technology and Computer (ICT) policy (ICT Policy for Lesotho, 2005).: “Vision:  To create a knowledge-based society fully integrated in the global economy by 2020;  ”This ICT vision anticipates that by year 2015, Lesotho will have successfully developed and deployed ICTs that;  Respond to national needs and priorities;.  Reduce inequalities between the sexes, and decrease the digital divide between urban and rural areas and the haves and have-nots;  Improve governance and deepen democracy.;  Develop the human capacity needed to drive and sustain an information economy and  Support its economic activities at home and throughout the world.” (Ibid) “Mission:  To fully integrate information and communications technologies throughout all sectors of the economy in order to realise rapid, sustainable socio-economic development; and  As Lesotho charts its course to join and fully participate in the global economy, it must embrace strategies to develop and deliver information to all its citizens. Thus, the vision and mission of the Government must be to create knowledge to fuel all sectors of the economy and enrich the intellectual capital of the nation” (Ibid). Historically COL has been quite involved along with the AAU and UNESCO on the African continent to develop ODEL in commonwealth African states. Many examples can be quoted for Lesotho, from 2003-2006, e.g.:  Supporting numerous representatives from Lesotho in attending professional development programmes, forums and policy development initiatives;  Supporting active participation from Lesotho in the Virtual University for Small States of the Commonwealth (VUSSC) initiative;  Several visits by the President of COL and COL education specialists to discuss country specific needs and planning how COL can assist Lesotho in the attainment of its education and health objectives;  Lesotho is an active participant in the VUSSC (for more details of VUSSC see section on Pan-Commonwealth initiatives);  Lesotho is a partner in the regional centre to support the SADC countries to develop their ODL systems.  The centre was the subject of a Memorandum of Agreement between COL and the Ministry of Education Botswana signed in June 2004;  COL and Lesotho have had a very successful partnership in 2003-2006 which has included several face to face meetings to discuss future direction. In the next planning period COL’s work with Lesotho will focus on education, learning for livelihoods and the human environment.; and  Lesotho’s commitment to VUSSC will be an important support to its efforts to strengthen the education system (COL, 2006). • CONCLUSIONS AND RECCOMMENDATIONS: A research document on the changing attitudes towards democracy in Lesotho, it describes transformation in democratic practices in Lesotho. It compiles three surveys on political attitudes and values done in 2000, 2003 and 2005. The outcomes show that overall, Lesotho's government appears to be politically stable and that democracy is regarded as a worthy political dispensation. It supports civil freedom with a growing feeling of trust in the public and government sectors (Afro Barometer. 2006). From an African policy point of view, however, it is time for the SADC to uphold the values and principles that promote human security and harness the principles of democracy and transparent governance, as enshrined in the SADC Protocol of the Organ for Politics, Defence and Security of 1996, which states that, “the Organ shall be to promote the development of democratic institutions and practices within the territories of the State Parties and encourage the observance of Universal Human Rights as provided for in the Charters and Conventions of the Organisations of African Unity and the United Nations respectively. (SADC, 1996:10). Subsequently we recommend that:  Further International action research must be launched through: • United Nations structures (UNITAR POCI, UNESCO’s OECD, UNITWIN and UNICEF); • COL; • African Union (AU); and • The World Bank.  An African Higher Education Approach could be through: • The Association for African Universities (AAU); • The African Council for Distance Education (ACDE); and • The African Regional Universities Associations for western—central--and southern --Africa. A practical example in southern Africa, it is that of the NEPAD E-learning project in the Meraka Institute at the Council for Science and Industrial Research (CSIR) into the rest of Africa (Cf Meraka, 2008). The following organisations within the ODEL movement of southern Africa could gradually be expected to align their research with internationally accepted ODEL programmes which include OER / FLOS civil education, namely:  The National Association for Distance Education and Open Learning of South Africa (NADEOSA);  The Distance Education Association for southern Africa (DEASA);  The South African Association for Research Development in Higher Education (SAARDHE);  The Higher Education Learning and Teaching Association of Southern Africa (HELTASA); and  The South African Association for Co-operative Association (SASCE). The afore mentioned international and Afrrian organizations are already in existence with proper research infra structures, funding donors and dedicated distance education practitioners who are eager to be part of the answer for southern African political conflicts. As far as ODEL and OER are concerned, one of the burning research problems still remain, namely the issue of access to OER. It has the ability to extend access to global knowledge but there are specific obstacles to ireacg this ideal. ”Access is one potential barrier – and a crucial challenge” says D’Antoni(2009) of UNESCO. Finally the ever expanding and development of new technological breakthroughs will inevitably set the pace for the immediate future such as in modern mobile generations and cloud computing. According to the Horizon Report (2009) some advanced higher education institutions are already using the two clusters of technologies, namely, “geo-everything” and the “personal web”. Futuristic technologies such as “semantic-aware applications” and “smart objects” may also be following quite soon in educational as well as the entrepreneurial fields. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BIBLIOGRAPHY African Conflicts. 2009.Google http://www.comhttp://www.google.co.za/search?hl=en&q=African+political+Conflicts&btnG=Google+Search&meta= Retrieved on 2009-02-09. Afro Barometer. 2006. www.afrobarometer.org (Retrieved on 2009-02-09) Amaefule, E. 2009. Chinese Company to replace Nigeria’s failed satellite. CIPACO. January 22. Anstey, M. 1991. Negotiating conflict. Cape Town: Juta. Bloomfield, D. & Reilly, B. 1998. Negotiation process: Democracy and deep-rooted conflict: Options for negotiators. Stockholm: International Idea. Burton, J. 1990. Conflict: Human needs theory. London: Macmillan. Commonwealth of Learning. 2009. COL Activities in 2003-2006. http://www.col.org Retrieved on 2009-02-09). Curle, A. 1990. Tools for transformation. United Kingdom: Hawthorn Press. D’Antoni. S. 2009.. Division for Education Strategies and Capacity Building UNESCO http://oerwiki.iiep-unesco.org (Retrieved 2009-02-9). De Beer, K.J. 1995 "Distance (contact) teaching at the Technikon OFS branches." in Selected conference papers of the 17th World Conference of the International council for Distance Education, Birmingham, United Kingdom. June. De Beer, KJ. And De Montfort, PJ. 2008. Community needs for co-operative peacekeeping training with Open and Distance E-Learning (ODEL) modes and Open Education Resources (OER) in Africa. Pan-Commonwealth Forum.July University of London. Deutsch, M. 1991. Subjective feature of conflict resolution: Psychological, social and cultural influences. In: Vayrynen,R. (ed.). New directions in conflict theory. London: Wales Press. pp 26-56. Dugan,M 2000. In Spies, C. spiesc@gmail.com ((Cf. httpwww.beyondintractabillity.org/essay/prejudice/. (Retrieved on 2009-02-16) Elliot, R. & John, H. 1971. Ulster: A case study in conflict theory. London: Longman. Galtung, J. 1996. Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. London: Sage. Governance and Transformation Programmes, 2009. governance.HUM@ufs.ac.za:2009). Hagg, G. 2008. Identity and violent conflict in Africa. http://www.hsrc.oc.za/hsrc-review-article-87.phtml. (Retrieved on 2008/06/08). Horizen Report. 2009. ICT Policy for Lesotho. 2005. Maseru. March 4. Lederach, J.P. 1995. Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Lederach, J.P. 1997(a). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in a divided society. Washington DC: United States of Peace Press. Lund, M. 1996. Preventing violent conflicts. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace. Mail & Guardian. 2008. Gauteng reels under xenophobic attacks. http://www.mg.co.za/article/2008-05-09-gauteng_reels-under-xenophobic-attacks. (Retrieved on 2008/11/05). Meraka Institute, 2009. www.meraka.org.za/ (Retrieved on 2009-01-13) Miall, H., Ramsbotham, O. & Woodhouse, T. 1999. Contemporary conflict resolution: The prevention, management and transformation of deadly conflicts. Cambridge: Policy Press. Murithi, T. 2006. Towards a symbiotic partnership: The UN Peace-building Commission and the Evolving African Union/NEPAD Post-conflict Reconstruction Framework. In: Adebajo, A. & Scanlon, H.(eds). Dialogue of the Deaf. Johannesburg: Jacana Media. pp 243-260. Munro, T (2008), Discussion sessions on Governance, Conflict and Social justice. Pan-Commonwealth Forum. University of London. July 12 .http://www.pcf5.london.ac.uk/pdfs/Forum%20Programme%20at%209%20July%202008.pdf (Retrieved on 2009/01/12) Notter, J. & Diamond, L. 1996. Building peace and transforming conflict: Multi-track diplomacy in practice. The Institute for Multi-Track Diplomacy: Occasional Paper (7). http://www.gmu.edu/academic/ijps/vol18-2/botes.html. (Retrieved on 2008/01/23). Ochieng, Z. 2007. : http://www.nationmedia.com/eastafri.... (Retrieved on 2009-02-11) Pettigrew and Tropp. 2000. In Spies, C spiesc@gmail.com http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/prejudice/. Retrieved on 2009-02-16. Plange, N.K. 1996. The Science of Sociology: Exploring the links between science, ideology and theories of development. South Pacific: East West Center Press. Political Map of southern Africa. Google. http://www.google.co.za/search?hl=en&q=Political+maps+southern+Africa&btnG=Google+Search&meta=(Retrieved on 2009/01/13) Reimann, C. 2005. Assessing the sate of the art in conflict transformation. http://www.bergho-handbook.net/articles/remainnhandbook.prof. (Retrieved on 2007/10/12). Richards, P. 2003. The political economy of internal conflict in Sierra Leone. Wetheriands Institute of International Relations. “Clingendael” Research Unit. http://www.clingendad.nl/cru/pdf/workingpaper2p4. (Retrieved on 2007/08/10). Robertson, I. 1989. Society: A brief introduction. New York: Worth Publishing. Rupesinghe, K. 2007. Biography. http://www.google.co.za/search?hl=en&q=Rupesinghe%27s+biography&btnG=Google+Search&meta (Retrieved on 2009-01-13) http://www.kumarrupesinghe.org/pages/BiographyFull.aspx. (Retrieved on 2008/04/30). SADC (Southern African Development Community). 1996. SADC history and background: Protocol on politics, defence, and security co-operation. http://www.sadcreview.com/sadc/sadc_profile.html . (Retrieved on 2007/11/18). SADOCC (Southern African Documentation and Cooperation Centre). 2002. Lesotho: Elections finally held. http://www.sadocc.at/news2002/2002-171.shtml. (Retrieved on 2005/07/13). Science in Africa. 2005. Africa’s first On-line Science Magazine. September. Schmid, H. 1968. Peace research and politics. Journal of Peace Research. 5(3): pp 217-232. Soanes, C. & Stevenson, A. 2004. Concise Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Solomon, H. & Mngqibisa, K. 2000. Towards conflict transformation in the Democratic Republic of Congo with specific reference to the model of Kumar Rupesinghe. http://www.up.ac.za/academic/liberts/polsci/nats/congo.html. (Retrieved on 2007/11/20). Spies, C. 2009 Radio broad cast on conflict resolution. South African Broadcasting Corporation. (spiesc@gmail.com) 2009/01-05. Stephen and Stephen (2000) in Spies spiesc@gmail.com Tladi, T. 2009. Unpublished MA Dissertation. University of the Free State. UNITAR POCI, 2009. www.peaceopstraining.org (Retrieved on 2009-01-13). Van Wyk, S. 2006. Eastern Free State voting proceeds smoothly. Volksblad, 2 March 2006. http://www.152.111.1.251/argief/berifte/volksblad/2006/03/03/vb/2Oostem.html. (Retrieved on 2006/10/15). Wallensteen, P. 2002. Understanding conflict resolution: War, peace and the global system. London: Sage. Walter, A.W 2004. John Paul Lederach: A peacebuilder bibliography. http://www.medicate.com/articles/wrightw2.cfm. (Retrieved on 2007/10/06). Winter, H.R. & Bellows, T.J. 1992. Introduction to political science. New York: Harper Collins Publisher.